powerpoint presentationsThis actually happened and it’s so dumb you’re going to find it hard to believe.


    I want you to imagine a business that turns over around three and a half million a year. It employs 30 managers and about 200 staff. They have some 400 customers.

    On the board of directors there’s a non-executive director who happens to run his own consumer research business.

    The company decided to survey their staff and clients to find out what they thought about how the company was doing. A questionnaire was drawn up under the direction of the marketing manager and sent out.

    A high response may be significant for other reasons

    The first point to note is that there was a very high rate of return – nearly eighty percent return rate.

    The marketing manager compiled the results into tables and constructed a PowerPoint presentation. She showed the presentation to the management team.

    The management team watched the presentation and thanked the marketing manager.

    Proud of her neat presentation the marketing manager suggested it be shown to the staff and to customers. The management team agreed.

    When the staff saw the presentation they were concerned by the results. At the end a single voice asked: “What is being done about the issues raised by the research?”

    The marketing manager replied for the management team: “that is not the purpose of this meeting. We simply wanted to show you the results of the survey.”

    The voice persisted, “thank you, but what action is being taken about some of the serious issues which have been revealed?”

    Zero action leads to disillusion

    There was no answer and the meeting ended. The staff left feeling disillusioned.

    The voice sent an e-mail to the non-executive director whose company had compiled the questionnaire in which she expressed the concerns she had raised in the meeting.

    The non-executive director did not reply.

    All of this begs the question, “why bother to do the research if you’re not committed to learning from and acting upon the feedback you get?”

    This is a classic example of a total absence of participative leadership. The senior managers are not engaged with the rest of the business. They are occupying some sort of superior position from which they do not deign to mess with the ordinary people.

    You may find this story shocking. Indeed, it is shocking, but, having spent over forty years in business I have to say that it is not that unusual.

    The points are that often managers do not know how to react to information they find unpalatable so they do nothing. In other instances they choose not to believe the evidence they have caused to be generated.

    History shows that those organisations that do not analyse valuable information fed back to them, learn from that information and change their ways often get into difficulties.

    That is why the fifth step of The Communication Cycle stresses the need to analyse feedback, learn and change.

    If you have been following the series of articles I’ve written about The Communication Cycle you will by now have noticed that they lock together to form a whole. No one section of the cycle is more important or less important than any other section.

    To become a transformational leader you need to master every step of the cycle. That may seem like a lot of work when you start, but as you think about and use each step so it will become your habitual behaviour and using it will become easier and more natural to you.

    If you enjoyed this post and found it useful you can ensure that you don’t miss future articles by having our articles delivered to you directly by e-mail.

    davidsig_small

    Related Articles

    1. What is Transformational Leadership?
    2. The Communication Cycle Step 1 – Aim
    3. The Communication Cycle Step 2 – Compose
    4. The Communication Cycle Step 3 – Transmit
    5. The Communication Cycle Step 4 – Feedback

{ 0 comments }

The Communication Cycle Step 4 – Feedback

by Leadership Coach, David Ferrers

    feedback from leadership coachThe motivation guru Anthony Robbins once said: “feedback is the breakfast of champions.”


    It is.

    Of course, it can sometimes be hard to accept feedback, especially when people are telling us “home truths” that we may not want to hear. But we should always listen to feedback.

    You need to accept that occasionally people are using the opportunity of having your undivided attention to vent their spleen or poison the water for others. But don’t use that as an excuse for never listening to feedback.

    Feedback is an essential element of The Communication Cycle. It is how you find out what impact you are making, what people really think and what they want of you.

    They lived in cloud cookoo land

    Early this year I heard of two separate incidences where corporations used 360º feedback. In both cases the programmes were not introduced in a sensible or sensitive way.

    The results of simply allowing people to state their opinions of others without having to take responsibility for the consequences were devastating. The recipients of the feedback were totally unprepared for the rush of bad feeling that was released against them.

    Now you could blame the organisers of the feedback for not briefing the givers of the feedback properly and for not preparing the recipients of the feedback for what might be said about them.

    But the fact is that if the recipients of the feedback were caught unprepared by what was said about them it shows that they were badly out of touch with the real feelings of those around them.

    That lack of awareness is an inditement of the leadership of the recipients. It clearly shows that they had not proper feedback procedures in operation.

    All leaders should, as the Boy Scouts motto advises, be prepared. Or perhaps more appositely they should be AWARE.

    The reason why we use stakeholders

    At the start of our Transformational Leadership Coaching Programme we ask our clients to appoint stakeholders for each candidate we will be coaching.

    The role of the stakeholder is to help us decide what leadership quality they would like the candidate to develop. They then tell us the level at which the candidate performs prior to the coaching. This is on a scale of minus 3 to plus three. Normally, prior to the coaching a stakeholder will rate a candidate at about minus 2 or 3.

    As the coaching progresses the stakeholder is asked to reassess the candidate so that we have an independent measure of how well the candidate is progressing.

    This feedback is invaluable for both the coach and the candidate.

    This is just one example of how, as a leadership coach I use feedback to prevent self-delusion and keep leaders properly informed.

    If you enjoyed this post and found it useful you can ensure that you don’t miss future articles by having our articles delivered to you directly by e-mail.

    davidsig_small

    Related Articles

    1. What is Transformational Leadership?
    2. How You Benefit From The Communication Cycle
    3. The Communication Cycle Step 1 – Aim
    4. The Communication Cycle Step 2 – Compose
    5. The Communication Cycle Step 3 – Transmit

{ 0 comments }

Can a Leadership Coach
Turn an Ordinary Manager
into an Effective Leader?

by Leadership Coach, David Ferrers

This is not about anything complicated like turning a sow’s ear into a silk purse.

Changing people’s abilities is simply a matter of changing their behaviours. And that is something we do all the time.
There is a certain amount of natural ability involved in some physical behaviours. For instance if you weigh 300 pounds you’re unlikely [...]

Read the full article →

The 7 Sins That Betray Weak Leaders

by Leadership Coach, David Ferrers

I just read a great article on the Leadership Now blog entitled The Seven Deadly Sins of Leadership.
The article highlights the 7 Leadership Sins defined by William Cohen in his book Drucker on Leadership.
The 7 sins are clearly defined and should be on every serious leader’s list of sins to avoid because there is rarely [...]

Read the full article →